Constitutional Law I

Section 1

Howard University School of Law

Prof. Steven D. Jamar
Houston Hall 402
202-806-8017
stevenjamar@gmail.com
fax: 202-806-8428

Syllabus

Spring 2021

HU Course No. 600-612

http://sdjlaw.org/ConLaw1/index.htm

last update 29 March 2021

This syllabus is subject to change to address current constitutional law developments and to meet the students' needs as perceived by the professor during the semester.

Where: Online Zoom

When: M T Th 1:40-2:30 pm

Course Overview

This course explores the power relationships enshrined in the United States Constitution. In this course you will examine the basic structures of the U.S. constitutional system, aspects of federalism including the balance of power between the federal government and the states, the historical development of the Supreme Court as an institution, the philosophical justifications for the exercise of judicial review and judicial authority of judges in a democratic society, and the various methods of legal reasoning that are brought to bear in interpreting the Constitution. Among the specific topics to be examined are judicial power including judicial review, jurisdiction, and the 11th Amendment; congressional power including the commerce power, spending power, Taxing power, and congressional power under the Reconstruction Amendments; executive branch including executive privilege and executive power over international relations and other matters; and the separation of power among the branches of government.   

Course Materials

Required

The Constitution

Steven D. Jamar, Constitutional Law: Power, Liberty, Equality (Wolters Kluwer 2017) ISBN 9781454870326. 2020 Supplement (pdf download) and other supplemental materials to be provided from Prof. Jamar from time to time.

Recommended Books

Additional Perspectives

Brian Landsberg and Leslie Jacobs, Global Issues in Constitutional Law (Thompson West 2007)

Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution:  Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It) (Oxford University Press 2006) (paperback edition 2007)

Study Aids

Allan Ides & Chistopher N. May, Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism – Examples and Explanations (8th ed. Wolters Kluwer 2019) ISBN-13: 9781543805949

Past exams (downloadable from the CL1 course homepage)

Professor Contact Information

Office:

402 Houston Hall

Phone:


Email:

stevenjamar@gmail.com (I will typically respond to email within 24 hours.)

Office Hours:

The times listed below may change. I will post up-to-date office hours online at http://sdjlaw.org/index

Mon

2:40-4:00

Tues

2:40-3:40

Thur

2:40-3:40



Occasionally I will not be able to keep these office hours because of other commitments.

If you need to see me at another time, please contact me so we can make an appointment.

These hours will be expanded in the latter part of the semester as student demand increases.

Grade Components

Final Examination

100 pts.

 

 

Course Requirements

Preparation

Read the assigned material before class each day. Be prepared to orally brief the cases and discuss the problems presented by the readings.

Attendance

The law school attendance policy will be enforced. Tardy students and students who leave class early or who leave and come back will be counted as absent.

SCHEDULE

Please note that this schedule identifies the topics to be considered in the order in which they will be considered and identifies the readings for the topics. At the end of each class, the readings for the next class will be assigned.

Part I.  Foundational Principles and Cases

Constitution Articles 1, 2, 3 & Amends. 1, 5, 10, 11, 14

Part I Foundations

Jamar ch. 1 Studying Constitutional Law (2017) pp. 1-13; Jamar 2020 Supp. p. 1-3

Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation, Jamar ch. 2 Foundational Principles and Cases (2017) pp. 13-48

Marbury v. Madison (1803) pp. 19-31

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816) pp. 32-35
Worcester v. Georgia
(1832) (Trail of Tears case) pp. 37-43
Ex parte McCardle
(1868) pp. 46-47

Approaches to Constitutional Interpretation  Jamar ch. 2 Foundational Principles and Cases (2017) pp. 48-65

Calder et Wife v. Bull et Wife (1798)    pp. 50-53
McCulloch v. Maryland
(1819) pp. 54-63

Federalism: Federal Power, State Power, and the Balance Between Them, Jamar ch. 2 Foundational Principles and Cases (2017) pp. 65-96

Chisholm 
v. 
Georgia (1793) pp. 67-74
Dartmouth College v. Woodard (1819) pp. 75-80
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) pp. 83-92
Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia (1851) pp. 92-95

Race and the Constitution  Jamar, ch. 2 Foundational Principles and Cases (2017) read pp. 96-107; 107-113; 129-30; 139

Part II. Federal Power

Introduction pp. 141-42

Judicial Function and Power  Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017)

Constitutional grant of judicial power, Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 143-46
Congressional power with respect to the judiciary, Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 146-49

Justiciability, Jamar, Judicial Power (2017) pp. 149-95
Justiciability -- Case or Controversy, Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 150
Justiciability -- Advisory opinions, Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 150-54

Justiciability -- Standing, Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 154-79

Lujan (1992) (standing basics and case or controversy aspects of standing) pp. 156-62
Congressional Power to Expand Standing pp. 162
Windsor (2013) (prudential aspects of standing) pp. 163-64
Allen v. Wright (1984) (substantive effects of standing) pp. 167-73

Standing -- Special cases  pp. 173-74
Standing -- Organizational and 3rd party standing pp. 175-76

Justiciability -- Ripeness, Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 179-81

Justiciability -- Mootness, Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 181-83

Justiciability -- Political Question  Jamar, ch. 3 Judicial Power (2017) pp. 183-94; 2020 Supp. pp. 2-14
Baker v. Carr (1962) pp. 184-92
Rucho v. Common Cause (2019) 2020 Supp. pp. 2-14

Legislative Power

Introduction to Congressional Power, Jamar Ch. 4  (2017) pp. 199-203

Commerce Clause  Jamar ch.  5

Introduction to the Commerce Clause power, Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (2017) pp. 203-05
Review Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Jamar Ch. 2 Foundational Principles and Cases (2017) pp. 83-92

National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012), Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (2017) pp. 205-31 (Although we will not cover all of NFIB in one day, I strongly recommend you work through it all because reading the concurrence and dissent should help you understand the majority opinion.)

Narrow construction of "commerce among the states" (1865-1937), Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (2017) pp. 233-34

Post-1937 Interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Clause, Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause pp. 234-47

Wickard v. Filburn (1942) pp. 235-38

Post-Wickard Applications of Commerce Clause Power   Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (2017) pp. 238-47

Heart of Atlanta v. United States (1964) pp. 239-45

The Court Shifts Again:  Federalism-based Limitations on Federal Power over Interstate Commerce   
Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (2017) pp. 247-65

United States v. Lopez (1995) pp. 249-57
Gonzales v. Raich (
2005) pp. 258-62

Power over States under the Federal Commerce Clause Power, Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (2017) pp. 266-69

Comparative Perspective on Governmental Power, Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (2017) pp. 269-70

Taxing Power  Jamar  ch. 6 Taxing and Spending Powers  pp. 273-85

Nat'l Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. ___ (2012) Jamar ch. 6 Taxing and Spending pp. 277-85

Spending Power Jamar ch. 6 Taxing and Spending Powers  pp. 285-96

Nat'l Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) Jamar ch. 6 Taxing and Spending pp. 286-94

Severability Jamar ch. 6 Taxing and Spending pp. 296-98

National Federation v. Sebelius (2012) (majority) pp. 291-92; (4 justice dissent) pp. 293-94

Necessary and Proper Power and Other Powers Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper and Other Powers pp. 301-15

Necessary and Proper  Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper and Other Powers pp. 301-10

Review: McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), Jamar ch. 2 Foundational Principles and Cases pp. 54-63
United States v. Comstock (2010)), Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper pp. 303-07
Review:  National Federation v. Sebelius (2012) Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause (Roberts' opinion) pp. 206-07, 215-16;
Review: Ginsburg dissent in National Federation (2012) Jamar Ch. 5 Commerce Clause pp. 226-28

Bankruptcy    Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper and Other Powers p. 310

Intellectual Property Power    Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper and Other Powers pp. 310-11

Immigration and Naturalization    Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper and Other Powers pp. 311-13

Congressional Power to Implement a Treaty Domestically    Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper and Other Powers pp. 313-15
Missouri v. Holland (1920)  (in notes) Jamar ch. 7 Necessary and Proper and Other Powers pp. 313-14

Congressional Power under the Reconstruction Amendments Jamar Ch. 8 Reconstruction Amendments pp. 317-60

Race and the Constitution, Jamar Ch. 2 Foundational Principles and Cases (2016) pp. 96-129

Read:  Prigg v. Pennsylvania (1842) pp. 101-04
Read:  Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) pp. 105-07
Read:  Corfield v. Coryell, 6 Fed. Cas. 546 (C.C.E.D. Pa. 1823) p. 112
Study:  The Slaughter-House Cases (1873) pp. 112-19
Study:  United States v. Cruikshank (1876) pp. 121-24
Study:  The Civil Rights Cases (1883) pp. 124-29
Read:  Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) pp. 130-38

Slavery, the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the Constitution  Jamar ch. 8 Congressional Power: The Reconstruction Amendments pp. 317-18
Congressional Power under the 14th Amendment   Jamar ch. 8  pp. 318-39

City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) pp. 322-29

Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs (2003) pp. 334-47

Congressional Power under the 15th Amendment  Jamar ch. 8 pp. 339-48

Shelby County v. Holder (2013) pp. 340-47

Congressional Power under the 13th Amendment  Jamar ch. 8 pp. 348-59

Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.(1968)  pp. 357-59

Summing up Congressional Power under the Reconstruction Amendments Amendment  Jamar ch. 8 pp. 359-60

Executive Power Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 363-438; 2020 Supp. pp. 14-24

Introduction to  Executive Power Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 363-66

President as Commander in Chief and the Use of Force  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 366-90
Presidential Power to Respond to Military Emergencies (1863)  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 369-90
                The Prize Cases (1863) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 370-73
After The Prize Cases (1863) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power p. 373
War Powers Applied Domestically Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power p. 373-75
                Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 375-84

        The Power to Declare War Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 384-90
Congressional Power over Foreign Relations – Authorizing the Use of Military Force    Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 385-89
War Powers Resolution of 1973 Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 385-87
President Nixon’s Veto of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 387-89
Executive Power over International Relations Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 390-404
            United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 390-93
Executive Power to Recognize Foreign States Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 393-94

Treaty Power  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 394-404
Settling International Disputes Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 395-404
            Dames & Moore v. Regan (1981) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 395-99
Domestic Application of Treaties Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp.  399-403
            Medellin v. Texas (2008) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 400-03
Legislative Power of the Executive Branch Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 404-06
            Executive Orders  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power p. 404
            Signing Statements  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power p. 405
The Executive Power to Execute the Laws  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 406-20
The Theory of the Unitary Executive Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 406-07
Administrative Agencies Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 407-13
Whitman v. American Trucking Associations, Inc. (2001) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 409-12
Administrative Agencies and the Executive Power Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 412; Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 14-15
The Executive Power of Appointment and Removal  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp.  413-20; Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 14-24 (insert in page 413 of main text)
Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission (2108) Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 16-24
M
orrison v. Olson (1988)  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 414-19
Limits on Congressional Power over the President’s Power of Appointment and Removal  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 419-20
Executive and Presidential Privilege and Immunity Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 420-38
Executive Privilege Against Disclosure of Information Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 421-25
            United States v. Nixon (1974) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 421-25
Presidential Immunity from being sued Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 426-35
                Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 426-30
Introduction to Clinton v. Jones (1997) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power p. 430
                Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 430-35
The Impeachment of President William J. Clinton (1993-2001) Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 435-36
Non-presidential Executive Privilege and Immunities  Jamar ch. 9 Executive Power pp. 436-37

Impeachment: Relevant clauses from the Constitution

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/25/what-you-need-know-about-impeachment-inquiry-into-trump/?fbclid=IwAR3Y_uWik89Hkz7aLlvCGWklDP9IV9cUb-lGi5Sy1vLLHsSan7RLcVZ7J9c

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/25/how-impeachment-works/?arc404=true&fbclid=IwAR0_io8JCTF6N7PnPnb6699nZWu5RSeln3OTZYdDhgxuUIeBS9IsgERqFGE

Separation of Powers Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 441-70

Introductory Note Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 441-42

Bicameralism and Presentment– the "Legislative Veto"  Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 442-50

INS v. Chadha (1983) Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 443-49

Line Item Veto Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 450-54

Clinton v. City of NY (1998) Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 450-54

Legislating in the Judicial Branch Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 454-57

Habeas Corpus -- Congressional and Executive Interference with the Judiciary Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 457-68

Boumediene v. Bush (2008) Jamar ch. 10 Separation of Powers pp. 457-68

Part III  Federal Constitutional Limitations on State Power

Introduction to Federal Constitutional Limits on State Power Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 473

State Power and Federal Constitutional Limits on It  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 471-536

Preemption Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 473-88

Introduction to Preemption pp. 473-74

Field Preemption Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 475-80

Pacific Gas v. State Energy Resources Commission (1983), Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 475-80

Conflict Preemption Based on Frustrating the Purpose of the Federal Law  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 480

Implied Preemption and Immigration Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 480-87

Arizona v. United States (2012) Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 482-87

Preemption and Anti-Commandeering

Murphy v. NCAA (2018) Jamar 2020 Supp. p. 41 (we will study the case under the Anti-Commandeering section below)

Dormant Commerce Clause, Jamar Ch. 11 State Power and Federal Constitutional Limits on It  pp. 488-526; Jamar 2020 Supp. (dormant commerce clause and the 21st Amendment; state taxation of interstate commerce) pp. 24-41

Introduction to the Dormant Commerce Clause,  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 488-90

Defining Mid-20th Century Cases, Jamar Ch. 11  pp. 490-92

South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., Inc. (1938) pp. 490-91

Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona (1945)  pp. 491-92

 Dormant Commerce Clause–Discrimination, Jamar Ch. 11  pp. 492-505

Dean Milk Co. v. Madison (1951)  pp. 493-95

Discrimination–More Milk  Jamar Ch. 11  p. 495-96

Discriminatory Effect of a Facially Neutral Regulation Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 496-99

Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm'n (1977) pp. 496-99

Discrimination Regarding Trash Disposal  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 499-502

City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey (1978) pp. 499-502

Dormant Commerce Clause and the 21st Amendment 2020 Supp. §11.3.2.4bis pp. 24-34

Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Ass'n v. Thomas (2019) 2020 Supp. pp. 24-34

Discrimination – The Public Necessity Exception  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 502-05

Maine v. Taylor (1986) pp. 502-05

Dormant Commerce Clause–Excessive Burden  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 505-14

Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. (1970) pp. 506-07

Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co., 449 U.S. 456 (1981) pp. 507-09

Government Performing Governmental Functions That Affect Interstate Commerce  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 509-14

United Haulers Association, Inc., v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority (2007)  pp. 509-14

Dormant Commerce Clause Limitations and Exceptions  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 514-523

State as a Market Participant  pp. 514

Reeves, Inc. v. Stake (1980) pp. 515-18

Limitations on the State as Market Participant Exception  pp. 518-20

The Federal Approval Exception pp. 520-23

Western & Southern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California (1981) pp. 520-21

Dormant Commerce Clause–Special Cases  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 523-527; Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 34-41

State Support of In-state Commerce  pp. 523-24

State Taxation  pp. 524-25; Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 34-41

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. (2018) Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 34-41

Licenses p. 525

Privileges and Immunities     Jamar Ch. 11  pp. 527-35

Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana (1978) pp. 529-33

The Privileges and Immunities Clause and Fundamental Rights pp. 533-35

Full Faith and Credit  Jamar Ch. 11 pp. 535-36

Note on the Incorporation Doctrine and Rights as Limits on States   Jamar Ch. 11 State Power and Federal Constitutional Limits on It  p. 536

Federalism and State Sovereignty  Jamar Ch. 12 Federalism & Sovereignty: The 10th and 11th Amendments pp. 539-99; Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 41-45

Introduction to Federalism and Sovereignty  Jamar Ch. 12 Federalism & State Sovereignty pp. 539-42

The Anti-Commandeering Limit on Federal Power to Regulate States Jamar Ch. 12  pp. 542-71

Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985) pp. 544-51
After Garcia (1985) pp. 551-52
The Anti-Commandeering Doctrine: State Legislation and Regulation Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 552-61; Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 41-45
New York v. United States (1992) pp. 553-61

Murphy v. NCAA (2018) Jamar 2020 Supp. pp. 42-45
The Anti-Commandeering Doctrine: State Enforcement of Federal Law Jamar Ch. 12  pp. 561-67
Printz v. United States (1997) pp. 561-66
Contextual Note after Printz (1997) pp. 566-67
Anti-Commandeering Doctrine Limited: Direct Regulation of Commercial Activity of States Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 567-69
Reno v. Condon (2000) pp. 568-69
Federalism in the Context of Anti-Commandeering Versus Direct Regulation of Commercial Actions by a State Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 569-70

Introduction to the 11th Amendment and State Sovereign Immunity  Jamar Ch. 12 Federalism & State Sovereignty p. 572
State Sovereign Immunity and Federal Regulation Jamar Ch. 12  pp. 572-73
State Sovereign Immunity Reborn  p. 573
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996) pp. 573-82
Developments After Seminole Tribe (1995) Jamar Ch. 12  pp. 582-86
Alden v. Maine (1999) (note) p. 583
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank (1999) (note) p. 583
Central Virginia Community College v. Katz (2006) (note) p. 584
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett (2001) (note) p. 584
Tennessee v. Lane (2004) (note) p. 585
Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. Hibbs (2003) (note) p. 585
Introduction to the Ex Parte Young (1908) Doctrine Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 586-99

Excerpt from Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking Glass (1872) Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 586-87
The Ex parte Young (1908) Doctrine Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 587-96
Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. Halderman (1984) pp. 588-96
Pennhurst (1984) in Context Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 596-97
A Proposed Amendment on State Sovereign Immunity Jamar Ch. 12 pp. 598-99

May 6, 2021 -- Final Exam

 

HU and HUSL Policies

Seriousness of Academic Purpose: To achieve its educational purposes, HUSL must maintain an environment conducive to learning and to scholarly endeavors of both faculty and students.  Seriousness of academic purpose requires students to prepare daily, to do assignments in a timely fashion, to attend class regularly, to be punctual, and to participate in class in meaningful way.

Attendance Policy (effective August 20, 2018): Regular and punctual attendance is an important part of a student's legal education.    In addition, a student's participation in class affects other students.  As a prospective attorney, a student should develop strong habits of regular attendance.  For these reasons, the American Bar Association and the Howard University School of Law require regular and punctual class attendance.    In addition, some Bar examiners require the Dean to certify that a student has regularly attended classes before they allow a graduate to sit for a bar examination.  

“Regular attendance” in a course means attending at least 85 percent of scheduled classes during the course of the semester.  The percentage of absences is intended to account for the range of minor illnesses, family obligations, interviews, and unplanned events that occur.

Clinics and externships may define “regular attendance” as requiring more than 85 percent of scheduled classes if that definition is clearly set forth in the course syllabus.

Absences due to curricular and co-curricular requirements will not be counted if the absence is due to an unavoidable scheduling conflict which neither the professor nor the student controls and the notice requirements set forth below are satisfied.  Examples of curricular and co-curricular requirements that might cause the type of conflict to which this provision applies include, inter alia, emergency court appearances, moot court competitions, and mock trial competitions.  If an absence is due to a scheduled curricular or co-curricular requirement, then the student must ask the professor of record for the class with the curricular or co-curricular requirement to notify the professor of record for the missed class in writing before the absence.  If an absence is due to an unscheduled or emergency curricular or co-curricular requirement, then the student must ask the professor of record for the class with the curricular or co-curricular requirement to notify the professor of record for the missed class in writing within 48 hours of the absence. http://law.howard.edu/content/attendance-policy

Academic Offenses: All students should note that cheating and plagiarism are academic offenses that violate the Howard University Student Code of Conduct and the Howard University School of Law Student Handbook.  Students are also expected to be familiar with the Academic Code of Conduct found in the H-Book. 

Howard University Statement of ADA Procedures: Howard University is committed to providing an educational environment that is accessible to all students.  In accordance with this policy, students in need of accommodations due to a disability should contact Director of Student Affairs Adrienne Packard regarding disability verification and determination of reasonable accommodations as soon as possible after admission to the School of Law, and at the beginning of each semester.  Ms. Packard can be reached at 806-8006 or adrienne.packard@law.howard.edu. 

"Writing Matters"
Writing is an essential tool for thinking and communicating in virtually every discipline and profession. Therefore, in this course I expect you to produce writing that is not only thoughtful and accurate, but also organized, clear, grammatical, and consistent with the conventions of the field. If your writing does not meet these standards, I may deduct points or ask you to revise. For assistance with your writing, go to the student section of the Writing across the Curriculum (WAC) website, http://www.cetla.howard.edu/wac/students.aspx.